LOCAL) POLICE STATION CASE No. 409 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court

Mr. Mritunjoy Chatterjee, Advocate Mr. Md. G. N. Imrohi, Advocate … … For the Petitioners … …For the State Mr. Atif Ahmed Siddiqui, Advocate Petitioners seek anticipatory bail. The de facto complainant did not make any allegations against her husband in a proceeding inter alia under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Considering the materials in the case diary and the involvement of the petitioners therein and considering the fact that there is no allegations against the husband, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner no. 3 will report before the Investigating Officer as and when called till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 will cooperate with the investigation till the conclusion of the investigation and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in 2 Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 3996 of 2022 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)