Judgment · High Court

Mr. Navanil De Mr. Rajeshwar Chakraborty Mr. Srinjan Ghosh Mr. subhrajit Dey Ms. Monami Mukherjee Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Avik Ghatak …for the petitioners. …for the State.

Heard learned Counsel for both the parties.

In a property dispute between the parties one of the of victim is alleged to have suffered fracture of his nasal bone. From the statement of the witnesses it is found that petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are alleged to have assaulted him.

From the materials on record, we do not find any prima facie offence has been made out under Section 307 IPC though case under Section 326 IPC is made out.

Regard being had to such facts and submissions, factum of permanent residence of the petitioners, nature of allegation, nature of injury as discussed (Supra) and substantial progress in investigation, it is directed that each of the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer in the event of their arrest in the aforesaid P.S. case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including the conditions that: i) The petitioner No. 1 (Mahesh Chouhan @ 2 Chowhan) and petitioner No. 2 (Umesh Chouhan @ Chowhan) are directed to appear before the I.O. once in a week on the day and time fixed by the I.O. the purpose of investigation submission of F.F. ii) The petitioners shall not threaten, induce or coerce any witness of this case in any manner whatsoever during the currency of this order.

The concerned Arresting Officer is hereby directed to act upon the server copy of this order.

Within 21 days from today each of the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. along with a server copy/certified copy of this order. If server copy is supplied, learned I.O. shall act upon that.

Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is allowed.

The application being CRM (A) 3261 of 2023 is disposed of. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 3