✦ Calcutta High Court

S.R.) SL.08 CT.32 CRM No. 7880 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court

S.R.) SL.08 CT.32 CRM No. 7880 of 2021

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Asif Dewan … for the petitioner. Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Sanjib Kumar Dan …for the State. Apprehending arrest in connection with Frezerganj Coastal Police Station Case No.128 of 2021, the instant application is filed by one of the co-accused praying for anticipatory bail. Mr. Dewan, learned lawyer appearing for the petitioner submitted that civil disputes are pending between the parties and the present petitioner along with others are falsely implicated for reason/motive best known by the de facto complainant. According to Mr. Dewan, in the given conspectus of facts, custodial interrogation is not necessary and anticipatory bail may be granted to the petitioner. Per contra, Mr. Dan, learned lawyer appearing for the State candidly submitted that no injury report is in the case diary and investigation is still pending. We have perused the case diary and heard rival submissions. On perusal of case diary and other materials and statements of the witnesses and considering the extent of incriminating elements, we are of the considered opinion that custodial interrogation in this case is not necessary. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner will be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with 2 two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure,

1973. It is further directed that the petitioners shall not intimidate the witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. It is made clear that in the event the petitioner fails to comply with the aforesaid directions without any justifiable cause, the learned trial court would be at liberty to cancel her bail without any further reference to this Court. The application for anticipatory bail being CRM No.7880 of 2021 is, accordingly, disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Sugato Majumdar, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. S.R.) SL.08 CT.32 CRM No. 7880 of 2021). ← Search more judgments