N. CASE No. 108 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Ms. Gulsanwara Pervin. …for the Petitioner. Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. A.P.P., Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharyya. ...for the State. … Petitioner. Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. We have considered the materials on record. Statements of witnesses and contemporaneous documents i.e. seizure memorandum show recovery of narcotic substance above commercial quantity i.e. 5.5 ltrs. of codeine mixture from the possession of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid incriminating materials on record and the statutory restrictions under Section 37 of the N. D. P. S. Act, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners is rejected. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.