Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 302
- Arms Act, 1959 ss. 25, 27
Key paragraphs
- Para 44. The application being CRM (A) 3025 of 2023 is dismissed. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 2
Judgment
Md. Yunush Mondal Mr. Pronojit Roy Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Ld. APP Mr. Manoranjan Mahata …for the petitioner. … for the State.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Though the case presented before us may be a good case under Section 439 Cr.P.C, we are not inclined to exercise our discretion under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in favour of the petitioner in view of the gravity of offence.
Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is rejected.
The application being CRM (A) 3025 of 2023 is dismissed. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.