Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- AMRITA SINHA
Outcome
Disposed of
petition stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Army Act, 1950 s. 123
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Judgment
Mr. Md. Sabir Ahmed, Mr. Md. Abdur Rakib, Mr. Biswajit Sarkar, Mr. Puranjan Pal, Mr. Mojahid Mehedi. …For the Petitioner. Mr. Amitabha Nayak, Mr. Arijit Bakshi. …For the Respondents.
Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the respondents submit, upon instructions that, the communication issued under Section 123 of the Army Act, 1950 dated 30th June, 2025 has been revoked vide order dated 18th August,
2025. The petitioner has been issued a movement order on 19th August, 2025.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has since been redressed.
Operative part
In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition stands disposed of.
The movement order and the revocation of the communication under Section 123 of the Army Act, 1950 filed in Court today be retained with the records. 2
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. ( Amrita Sinha, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Army Act, 1950 — s. 123.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.