✦ Calcutta High Court

Jiyad Ali Sardar v. The State of West Bengal ors. Adv. Omar Faruk Gazi, Adv. Pratikur

SUVRA GHOSH2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
SUVRA GHOSH

Provisions considered

Judgment

communicated to the parties within a week thereof. In the event the construction raised by the private respondent found to be illegal/unauthorised, the concerned authority shall take necessary steps accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall however, be no order as to costs. Since no affidavit is invited, the allegations contained in the petition are deemed not to have been admitted. 3 Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments