KARANDIGHI POLICE STATION CASE No. 156 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHITTA RANJAN DASH, PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 323, 325, 498A
Judgment
Mr. Md. Nauroz Rahber Mr. Md. Jawwad Mr. S. G. Mukherji, PP Mr. Aniket Mitra Ms. J. Saha …for the petitioner. …for the State.
Heard learned Counsel for both the parties.
The petitioner is stated to be the mother-in-law of the victim wife.
In the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. the allegation is mainly against the husband.
Regard being had to such facts and submissions, factum of permanent residence of the petitioner, nature of allegation, the fact that there is always hope of compromise in matrimonial disputes and such compromise is always in the interest of the family and society and substantial progress in investigation, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer in the event of her arrest in the aforesaid P.S. case on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
The concerned Arresting Officer is hereby directed to act upon the server copy of this order. 2
Within 21 days from today the petitioner shall appear before the I.O. along with a server copy/certified copy of this order. If server copy is supplied, learned I.O. shall act upon that.
5. Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is allowed.
6. The application being CRM (A) 2756 of 2023 is disposed of. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.) 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.