CRIME POLICE STATION CASE No. 11 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 354(1), 354C, 354D, 500, 506, 507, 509
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected and the same is accordingly disposed of.
Judgment
Mr. Pawan Kumar Gupta Mr. Sougata Mitra Ms. Sofia Nesar Mr. Santanu Sett Ms. Soma Chakraborty For the Petitioners Mr. Soumik Ganguly Mr. Sujoy Sarkar For the State
Considering the materials available in the case diary and the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C directly implicating the petitionerd for making viral indecent pictures and videos, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected and the same is accordingly disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Soumen Sen, J) (Uday Kumar , J) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.