AKG v. Biddhannagar Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Subhankar Chatterjee Mr. Tirthankar Dey, Mr. Arka Kr. Nag …for the Petitioners ..for BMC The petitioner on an earlier occasion approached this Court by filing WPA 4215 of 2024 (Jyoti Gupta vs. Biddhannagar Municipal Corporation & Ors.) demolition of an alleged unauthorised construction at plot no. AC-91, Seector-I, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-
700064. A coordinate Bench of this Court by an order dated May 1, 2024, directed the petitioner to make an appropriate representation before the Municipal Biddhannagar Municipal Corporation Corporation was directed to consider the same in accordance with law. The petitioners have again filed this writ petition with a prayer for demolition of the same construction. Learned advocate appearing for the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation submits that in compliance with the order dated May 1, 2024, the petitioners made 2 a representation before the Corporation, and following the said representation, the Corporation has already initiated a proceeding under Section 216 of the West Bengal Municipal Corporation Act, 2006. Having regard to the aforesaid, I am of the view that the present writ petition is not maintainable. Accordingly, WPA 15934 of 2024 is dismissed. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the learned advocates for the parties on usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.