✦ Calcutta High Court

SOUMEN MITRA NIVEDITA MITRA v. None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any

Judgment

None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf even in the third call. The matter had appeared on 09.07.2026 when neither of the parties were represented. The Report filed on behalf of the Department also suggests that no steps have been taken by the appellant in complying with the necessary formalities. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 338 of 2019 along with all pending applications, if any stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The Department is directed to send a copy of this order along with the Trial Court Records, if any to the concerned District Court. [RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.] [RISHAD MEDORA, J.]

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments