✦ Calcutta High Court

JORASANKO POLICE STATION CASE No. 17 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court

JORASANKO POLICE STATION CASE No. 17 of 2024SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 11. On an undertaking that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the amount finally assessed by CESC Ltd. within one week from date, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary.
  • Para 22. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner namely, Ratnesh Shrivastava shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two registered sureties of like amount each, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also to…
  • Para 44. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed of.

Judgment

In Re: Ratnesh Shrivastava Mr. Bidyut Kumar Halder Mr. Indranil Halder Petitioner For the Petitioner Ms. Sonali Das Mr. Tirupati Mukherjee For the State Ms. Sreyashee Biswas For CESC Ltd.

1.

On an undertaking that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the amount finally assessed by CESC Ltd. within one week from date, we are of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary.

2.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner namely, Ratnesh Shrivastava shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two registered sureties of like amount each, subject to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also to comply with the conditions as laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a week or as and when called for till the submission of the final report and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Calcutta within two weeks from date in connection with Jorasanko Police Station Case No. 17 of 2024. In the event of non-compliance of any of the conditions, the anticipatory bail Signed By : AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 3 rd of July 2024 12:28:30 PM 2 shall stand automatically cancelled without any further reference to this Court.

3.

The statutory right of appeal against the final assessment is not, however, affected by this order.

4.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed and the same is accordingly disposed of.

5.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Soumen Sen, J) (Uday Kumar , J) Signed By : AMITAVA ROY High Court of Calcutta 3 rd of July 2024 12:28:30 PM

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JORASANKO POLICE STATION CASE No. 17 of 2024). ← Search more judgments