HASNABAD POLICE STATION CASE No. 83 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SOUMEN SEN, UDAY KUMAR
Outcome
Bail refused
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 164, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 120B, 363, 365, 376(2)(i)(n), 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 33. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Judgment
Mr. Sagnik Bhattacharya, Mr. Md. Sahinurzaman Mr. Biswajit Sarkar Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. APP, Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya ….for the petitioner. ….for the de facto complainant. …. for the State.
The victim is represented.
Considering the materials available in the case diary and more particularly the statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Operative part
Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Soumen Sen, J.) (Uday Kumar, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — ss. 164, 438; Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 120B, 363, 365, 376(2)(i)(n), 506.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.