✦ Calcutta High Court

D/L45 v. M/s. Citicorp Finance (I) Ltd

TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Case at a glance

Bench
TIRTHANKAR GHOSH

Judgment

Ms. Rituparna De Ghose, Mr. Siddhartha Paul. …for the petitioner. The present revisional application was filed challenging the proceedings being C. Case No.21089 of 2008 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Ms. Rituparna De Ghose, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the disputes have been settled with the complainant/opposite party. To that effect, she has received written instructions and, as such, does not intend to pursue with the present revisional application. Accordingly, CRR 2332 of 2009 is dismissed as not pressed. Written instructions submitted by Ms. Rituparna De Ghose be kept with the record. Pending connected application, if any, is consequently disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments