KALIGHAT P.S. CASE No. 145 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHITTA RANJAN DASH, APURBA SINHA RAY
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 41A, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 406, 498A
Key paragraphs
- Para 55. The application being CRM(A) 2437 of 2023 is disposed of.
Judgment
Mr. Tapas Maity ... for the petitioners Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan, Ms. Baishakhi Chatterjee ... for the State
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
The petitioner nos.1, 2 and 3 are the father-in-law, mother-in-law and sister-in-law respectively of the informant. Investigation is stated to have progressed substantially.
Regard being had to such facts and submissions, factum of permanent residence of the petitioners, nature of allegation, substantial progress of the investigation and the fair submission at the Bar to the effect that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 have had appeared before the IO in obedience to notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. It is directed that each of the petitioners shall be released on bail by the Arresting Officer in the event of their arrest in the aforesaid police station case on such terms and 2 conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.
Accordingly, the prayer for the anticipatory bail is allowed.
The application being CRM(A) 2437 of 2023 is disposed of.
The concerned Arresting Officer is hereby directed to act upon the server copy of this order. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.