Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 439
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 302, 379
Judgment
Mr. Sourav Chatterjee Md. Zeeshan Uddin Ms. Amrin Khatoon … … for the petitioners Mr. Madhusudan Sur .. ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Manoranjan Mahata Ms. Nandini Chatterjee … … for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that they are in custody for about two years. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail. We have considered the materials on record. Statements of eyewitnesses who were present at the spot disclose the role of the petitioners in the murder. In view of the aforesaid incriminating materials and gravity of the offence, we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant bail to the petitioners at this stage. The application for bail is thus rejected. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.