✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay, Ms. Lipika Chatterjee ….for the petitioner. ….for the WBCSSE. ….for the West Bengal Information Commission. ….for the State. Petitioner participated in the first State Level Selection Test, 2016 for recruitment in the post of assistant teacher in Higher Secondary Section as General Category candidate in Nutrition (PG). After participating in the said selection process petitioner sought for certain information from the concerned authority of the West Bengal Central School Service Commission by making an application under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act, 2005. Since such application has not been responded to petitioner approached the 2 West Bengal Information Commission and the application before the Information Commission is still pending. Petitioner wants response application in order to get information based on queries as contained in the said application which he has made under the Right to Information Act.

Mr. Saha, learned advocate representing the West Bengal Information Commission has submitted that at present the post of Chief Information Commissioner is lying vacant therefore the Commission is not in a position to function till such post is filled up. Dr. Patra, learned advocate appears on behalf of the West Bengal Central School Service Commission and has disputed preferring such application under the Right to Information Act to the concerned authority of the West Bengal Central School Service Commission which is at pages 22 and 23 of the writ petition. This Court has heard the learned advocates representing the parties and perused the relevant materials available on record. It appears that apart from the application which has been made by the 3 petitioner under Section 6 of the Right Information Act, 2005 representation dated 11th June, 2019 has been made to the Assistant Secretary, West Bengal Central School Service Commission in order to get information to the queries as contained in the application which the petitioner made under Section 6 of the Right to Information Act.

Considering the present position with regard functioning of the West Bengal Information Commission, this Court apposite to direct the Assistant Secretary, West Bengal Central School Service Commission to supply information as sought for by the petitioner through his representation dated 11th June, 2019. Petitioner is directed to submit a copy of the representation dated 11th June, 2019 to the Assistant Secretary of the West Bengal Central School Service Commission within seven days from this date. If such representation is submitted before the Assistant Secretary within the aforesaid period the Assistant Secretary in his turn shall supply information to the petitioner within eight weeks thereafter. 4 With the above direction the writ petition stands disposed of. However, There shall be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments