✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

CHANCHAL POLICE STATION CASE No. 280 of 2024DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI2 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 99. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to…
  • Para 1010. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. Signed By : ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of May 2024 04:17:14 PM 3

Judgment

Mr. Avishek Sinha Ms. Suchismita Dutta Md. Wasim Akram Ms. Reshmi Khatun …for the petitioners. … for the State. … for the de facto complainant.

1.

Petitioners, State and the de facto complainant are represented.

2.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that, the de facto complainant was married to a different person. There is a First Information Report lodged by her against the earlier husband.

3.

It is contended on behalf of the de facto complainant that, the first marriage stood dissolved.

4.

We requested the learned Counsel for the de facto complainant to produce any document as to the so-called dissolution of the earlier marriage to which learned Counsel for the de facto complainant submits that, the earlier marriage was dissolved orally. Signed By : ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of May 2024 04:17:14 PM 2

5.

Benefit of doubt obviously must be extended to the accused.

6.

Here the petitioners are being proceeded against on the basis of a marriage.

7.

The marriage, thus, cannot be accepted in the eye of law at this stage.

8.

In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

9.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner no.1 will report before the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and petitioner nos.2 and 3 will cooperate with the investigation till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear on every date before jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

10.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. Signed By : ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of May 2024 04:17:14 PM 3

11.

C.R.M. (A) 1796 of 2024 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) Signed By : ABHIJIT DAS High Court of Calcutta 22 nd of May 2024 04:17:14 PM

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. CHANCHAL POLICE STATION CASE No. 280 of 2024). ← Search more judgments