CRM(DB) No. 2146 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty …..for the petitioner Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, learned PP Mr. A. Ganguly Mr. Pratick Bose ….. for the State Mr. Sofiul Islam Mondal …… for the defacto complainant Heard the learned Counsels for the parties. We have considered the materials on record. Evidence of victim has been recorded. Her evidence is exonerative in nature. In view of the aforesaid development and the period of detention suffered by the petitioner, we are inclined to grant bail to him. Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, subject to the condition that petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. 2 In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.