Putul Saha v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 25 May 2023
- Bench
- KRISHNA RAO
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 325, 354, 379
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 91
Judgment
Mr. Sankar Halder Mr. Sarthan Burman ….for the petitioner Mr. Jahar Datta Mr. Bipin Ghosh …for the State The petitioner has filed the present application with the grievance that the police has not taken any steps on the complaint made by the petitioner and has not seized the stolen articles which the petitioner has mentioned in the complaint. The learned Counsel for the State has submitted the report wherein it reveals that the police of P.S. Kotwali, KPD, District-Nadia has initiated an FIR being 491/2023 dated 25th May, 2023 under Sections 354/325/379/34 of the IPC. It also reveals from the record that investigating officer has issued notices under Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. as well as 41A of the Cr.P.C. to the accused persons. It is find from the record that the investigation is going on and no further order can be passed in the present writ application. W.P.A 12864 of 2023 is thus disposed of. 2 The report submitted by the Counsel for the State is kept with the record. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioner is kept with the record. (Krishna Rao, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 325, 354, 379; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 91.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Calcutta High Court, on 25 May 2023. The bench was KRISHNA RAO.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.