CHAKDAH POLICE STATION CASE No. 190 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DEBANGSU BASAK, BIBHAS RANJAN
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 438, 438(2)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 306
Judgment
Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das, Ms. Rupsa Sreemani, Advocate … … For the Petitioners Mr. Prasun Bhattacharya, Mr. MFA Begg, Advocates … …For the State Considering the fact that wife of the deceased was enlarged on bail by the jurisdictional Court and considering the postmortem report of the victim, the materials in the case diary and the relationship of the petitioners with the victim and considering the fact that police filed charge sheet, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to 2 secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. CRM (A) 3053 of 2022 is disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.