✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

A) No. 2788 of 2022

Case at a glance

Judgment

Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. Shashanka Shekhar Saha ….. petitioners … for the Petitioners. Mr. S. S. Imam Mr. Sk. Arif Hossain …… for the State Heard the learned advocates for both the parties. We have considered the materials on record. Keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioners in the alleged crime and as the principal accused has been granted pre-arrest bail, we are inclined to extend the same privilege to the petitioners also. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Petitioners shall appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date. The application being CRM (A) No. 2788 of 2022 is disposed of. ( Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J. ) ( Joymalya Bagchi, J.) 2

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. A) No. 2788 of 2022). ← Search more judgments