✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

NALHATI POLICE STATION CASE No. 161 of 2022ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY, JOYMALYA BAGCHI

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Bitasok Banerjee Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya ..…for the petitioner Mr. Sanjoy Bardhan Ms. Baishakhi Chatterjee ….. for the State Petitioner is in custody for 63 days. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that the victim was major at the time of cohabitation. Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner had cohabited on the false promise of marriage and the victim had become pregnant. We have considered the materials on record in the light of the submission made on behalf of the petitioner that the victim was major at the time of cohabitation and was aware of the consequences thereof. Under such circumstances and in view of period of detention suffered by the petitioner i.e. 68 days, we are inclined in granting bail to him. 2 Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampurhat, Birbhum, subject to the condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. In the event, the petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner in accordance with law without further reference to this Court. The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. NALHATI POLICE STATION CASE No. 161 of 2022). ← Search more judgments