✦ Calcutta High Court

Kartick Sarkar & Ors. v. Inspector General of Registration & Commissioner of Stamp Revenue, Kolkata & Ors.

MADHURESH PRASAD, PRASENJIT BISWAS2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
MADHURESH PRASAD, PRASENJIT BISWAS

Outcome

Dismissed

The Writ Petition is dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 1010. The Writ Petition is dismissed. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)

Judgment

9.

We, therefore, do not find any infirmity in the order dated 15.05.2025 passed by the Tribunal in O.A. No. 4 of 2021, rejecting the petitioners’ claim, requiring interference by this Court in exercise of extraordinary and discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Operative part

10.

The Writ Petition is dismissed. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The Writ Petition is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — arts. 14, 16, 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments