HASNABAD PS CASE No. 697 of 2025 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Jewel Chanda Ms. Rumki Guha Mr. Sourav Ghosh Mr. Rajendra Banerjee, ld. APP Mr. Sanjib Das Mr. P. Karan Singh … for the Petitioner(s) … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for seven months. Learned advocate refers to page 16 of the application which is in respect of an FIR submitted by the Commander of BSF. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Having considered the peculiar circumstances under which the petitioner is facing trial and the fact that there was no ill intention to enter into this country, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. 2 Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Lili Rani Biswas @ Subhashree shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned ACJM, Bashirhat, North 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall make herself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of North 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned trial court. The learned trial court is directed to complete the trial within a period of one year, thereafter, take steps in consonance with the provisions of law. Accordingly, CRM (M) 1212 of 2026 is allowed. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 3
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.