✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

GAURANG KANTH, JOYMALYA BAGCHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Bail refused

Accordingly, application for cancellation of bail is dismissed

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, application for cancellation of bail is dismissed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Judgment

Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder Mr. M Mukherjee ...... for the petitioner

1.

We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner was in custody for a considerable period of time. Amount of narcotics alleged to be seized is below commercial quantity.

2.

Considering the aforesaid relevant circumstances trial judge enlarged opposite party on bail.

3.

We do not find any illegality in the order impugned. There is no allegation of misuse of liberty.

Operative part

4.

Accordingly, application for cancellation of bail is dismissed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, application for cancellation of bail is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 439(2).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments