Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ss. 482, 482(2)
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 325, 341, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Ms. Sukanya Bhattacharya Ms. Puspita Saha … for the State Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the false implication of the petitioner is fallout of a fight relating to a Darga. There are case and counter case. No grievous injury was inflicted on anyone. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and refers to the statement and injury report. Charge-sheet has been submitted. In view of the fact that there are case and counter case, the materials available in the case diary and the fact that the charge-sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each, one of 2 whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and on the further conditions that the petitioner shall attend the jurisdictional court on the dates fixed and shall not threaten or intimidate witnesses. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Jay Sengupta, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.