Sandhya Majhi v. Pradip Narayan Roy
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
CPAN No.967 of 2001 Sandhya Majhi -vs- Pradip Narayan Roy arising out of WPA No.88 of 2000 None …for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner. The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed on July 13, 2001, sought punishment alleged contemner/respondent concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated July 17, 2000 passed by this court in WP No.88(W) of 2000. It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it. I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand. Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J] 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.