Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 215
Judgment
Judgment
Ct. No. 14 13
28.9 2022 (F.N.H.) C.P.A.N. 987 of 2003 In W.P. 6085 (W) of 2003 Kanu Ghosh –Versus- Prafulla Kumar Mondal & Anr. ( Main File Not In Court ) None appears on behalf of the petitioner at the time of call. This is an application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner on 1st July, 2003. The petitioner by filing the instant application, sought for punishment of the alleged contemnors for violation of the order dated 11th April, 2003 passed in W.P. 6085 (W) of 2003. Since the filing of the application, none appeared for the petitioner to press the application. I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the contempt application on hand. Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. Let this contempt application along with the order passed today be tagged with the main file by the concerned department. ( Rabindranath Samanta, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Constitution of India — art. 215.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.