✦ Calcutta High Court

FIRST INFORMATION REPORT CASE No. 41 of 2023 · Calcutta High Court

FIRST INFORMATION REPORT CASE No. 41 of 2023DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI

Case at a glance

Bench
DEBANGSU BASAK, SHABBAR RASHIDI

Provisions considered

Judgment

Ms. Devi Priya Mitra .…for the petitioners Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherji, Ld. P.P. Mr. Partha Pratim Das, Ms. Eshita Dutta .…for the State Petitioners are the sisters-in-law of the victim. Apparently, the victim committed suicide. There is a statement of the child of the victim recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In such statement, the child stated that there was an altercation between the petitioners and the victim. Thereafter, the victim committed suicide. The materials in the case diary does not at this stage suggest that there was any abetment on the part of the petitioners in the suicide committed by the victim. In such circumstances, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2 Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the Investigating Officer and on condition that the petitioners will appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. FIRST INFORMATION REPORT CASE No. 41 of 2023). ← Search more judgments