✦ Calcutta High Court

AP MAT 644 of 2025 With CAN 1 of 2025 BSP Enterprise & Ors. v. The Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation Ms. Sanghamitra Nandy Mr. Arka Kumar Nag Mr & Ors.

RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA2 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
RAJASEKHAR MANTHA, AJAY KUMAR GUPTA

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 88. With the aforesaid observations, the appeal is disposed of.

Judgment

of Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay.

2.

This Court is, however, of the view that the appeal itself can be disposed of.

3.

The writ petition was filed seeking a direction upon the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation to release payments of work done by the writ petitioner in Work Order Serial No. 18 of N.I.T. No. 443/PWD/ROAD/BMC dated 29th January, 2021. The Single Bench found that the respondents had seriously disputed the claim of the petitioner. In this back drop the Court found that the disputed claims cannot be entertained by a Writ Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ petition was, therefore, dismissed by an order dated 8th April, 2025 granting liberty to the appellants to take out appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. 2

4.

This Court finds that the impugned order dated 8th April, 2025 is passed on sound reasoning and in accordance with the applicable law of the land and calls for absolutely no interference.

5.

However, since the counsel for the appellants submits that the respondents have not issued any completion certificate or certified the measurement books of the work done, the appellants may make a comprehensive representation to the Commissioner of the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation. If such representation is made within a period of seven days from date, the Commissioner of the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation after giving a hearing to the appellants passed appropriate orders as he may deem fit in accordance with law.

6.

Let the consideration by the Commissioner of the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation be effected within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation of the appellants.

7.

Let any decision that may be taken by the Commissioner, Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation be communicated to the appellants forthwith thereafter.

8.

With the aforesaid observations, the appeal is disposed of.

9.

Consequently, all connected pending applications, if any, are also disposed of. 3

10.

There shall be no order as to costs.

11.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments