Sri Manju Duley v. Furuk Bala Duley & Ors.
Case at a glance
Outcome
Disposed of
application stands disposed of
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 39 rr. 1, 2
Judgment
Operative part
Mr. Debabrata Ray …for the petitioner A direction to secure expeditious disposal of an application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 C.P.C. in Title Suit No.176 of 2014, now pending before learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, at Khatra, Bankura, is the ultimate releif sought for in this case. No other point is raised requiring address by this Court. In view of the nature of order proposed to be made in this case, no prior notice is considered to be necessary. Service of notice upon the opposite parties stands dispensed with. Accordingly, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, Khatra, Bankura, is requested to ensure expeditious disposal of injunction application referred hereinabove, providing sufficient opportunity of 2 hearing to either of the parties to this, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, unless it is extremely unavoidable. This would not, however, prevent the court below to reach logical conclusion of the pending partition suit expeditiously after adhering to the provisions of law. Petitioner is directed to make communication of this order to the learned court below as well as to the opposite parties and their advocate in the court below. With this observation/direction, the revisional application stands disposed of. Urgent certified photostat copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties as expeditiously as possible on compliance of all necessary formalities. (Subhasis Dasgupta, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: application stands disposed of
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 39 rr. 1, 2.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.