BAZAR POLICE STATION CASE No. 817 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ss. 161, 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 325, 326, 341
Judgment
Ms. Minoti Gomes, Mr. Musharraf Alam Sk., Advocates … … For the Petitioner Ms. Sreeparna Das, Advocate … …For the State Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the victim suffered fractured injuries. She refers to the statement of the victim recorded under Section 161 of the Criminal Procedure Code. She submits that the victim attributes specific role to the petitioner as the assailant. Considering the gravity of the offence and involvement of the petitioner therein, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. CRM (A) 2237 of 2022 is dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.