A) No. 1198 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- A(C) of the Bengal Excise Act, 1909
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 186, 307, 332, 353
Judgment
Mr. Joydeep Roy Ms. Sudeshna Das .…for the State
1.
We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner had obstructed police personnel who had undertaken search to recover illicit liquor.
2.
In view of the nature of the offence, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. (Gourang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : Surojit Das High Court of Calcutta 18 th of April 2024 11:46:36 PM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. A) No. 1198 of 2024).
← Search more judgments