A) No. 1167 of 2024 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 376, 448
Judgment
Mr. Jisan Iqbal Hossain ..…for the petitioner Mr. Arijit Ganguly Ms. Puspita Saha .…for the State
1.
We have considered the materials on record. Statement of the victim implicates the petitioner in the offence of rape.
2.
In view of the materials on record and gravity of the offence, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3.
The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : Surojit Das High Court of Calcutta 9 th of April 2024 05:53:17 AM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. A) No. 1167 of 2024).
← Search more judgments