✦ Calcutta High Court

Sl 26 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION v. The State of West Bengal & Anr.

BIBHAS RANJAN

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

revisional application stands dismissed for default

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the revisional application. The revisional application stands dismissed for default.

Judgment

Mr. Rana Mukherjee, Ld. A.P.P. …for the State.

1.

Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appears on behalf of the State.

2.

None appears on behalf of the petitioner on call.

3.

This revisional application is pending since 2018 with a prayer for quashing the order dated

19.02.2018 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barrackpore under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Operative part

4.

It appears that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the revisional application. The revisional application stands dismissed for default.

5.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

6.

Connected applications also stand dismissed.

7.

Department is directed to communicate a copy of this order learned Trial Court information. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: revisional application stands dismissed for default

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 156(3).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments