✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 44. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Kamal Shaw shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Chandannagar, Hooghly subject to…

Judgment

Mr. Suman Chakraborty. …for the Petitioner. Mr. Joydeep Roy, ld. Jr. Govt. Adv., Ms. Rajnandini Das. ...for the State.

#1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.

#2. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner is in custody for one year and six months. Co-accused has been enlarged on bail. Petitioner stands on the same footing with the said co-accused.

#3. Under such circumstances, we are inclined to extend the same privilege to the petitioner.

#4. Accordingly, the petitioner viz., Kamal Shaw shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. Chandannagar, Hooghly subject to condition that he shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever. Signed By : ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 5 th of April 2024 04:36:39 PM 2

#5. In the event petitioner fails to appear before the trial court without any justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

#6. This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Gaurang Kanth,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : ALOK SETH High Court of Calcutta 5 th of April 2024 04:36:39 PM

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.

Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. BHADRESWAR P.S. CASE No. 539 of 2022). ← Search more judgments