Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 325, 326, 448, 506
Key paragraphs
- Para 22. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : Surojit Das High Court of Calcutta 15 th of April 2024 12:29:32 AM
Judgment
Mr. Jisan Iqbal Hossain ..…for the petitioners Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Mr. Rafikul Islam ..for the State Mr. S. Shah Mr. A. A. Mondal ..for the de facto complainant
#1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits his clients do not wish to press the application for anticipatory bail.
#2. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as not pressed. (Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : Surojit Das High Court of Calcutta 15 th of April 2024 12:29:32 AM
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No treatment data yet for this judgment in the Courts & Cases corpus.
Absence of data is not a statement about the judgment’s standing — the corpus covers only judgments we index and link with cited evidence.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. A) No. 1138 of 2024).
← Search more judgments