✦ Calcutta High Court

Sk. Abul Basar v. The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

The writ petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

Mr. Rafikul Isam Sardar … for the petitioner. Ms. Sanghamitra Nandi Mr. Raja Ram Banerjee … for the State. Mr. Sandipan Banerjee Mr. Sobhan Majumder Mr. Ankit Sureka … for HMC. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that in response to the complaint filed by the petitioner alleging unauthorized construction, a hearing was conducted by the Howrah Municipal Corporation but no final order has been passed as yet. Learned advocate the Howrah Municipal Corporation has produced a copy of the communication made by the Assistant Engineer, Borough-VII, Howrah Municipal Corporation dated August 6, 2022 addressed to the person responsible for making construction being respondent no. 8 herein to demolish unauthorized construction in accordance with the provisions under Section 177(1) of the Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. 2 The communication mentions that if the person responsible fails to comply with the order of self- demolition, then the Corporation authority will cause the order to be carried out and expenses thereof will be recovered as per the provisions of the Act. As it appears that the order of self-demolition has already been passed by the Howrah Municipal Corporation, accordingly, the Corporation is directed to take steps for implementation of the same strictly in accordance with law. The writ petition stands disposed of. Copy of the hearing notice issued by the Howrah Municipal Corporation dated May 6, 2022 and the copy of the communication dated August 6, 2022 addressed to the person responsible be retained with the records. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties expeditiously on compliance of usual legal formalities. Sh (Amrita Sinha, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Howrah Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 — s. 177(1).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments