No. 918 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Ashok Das Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. S Mukherjee Ms. Faria Hossain Mr. Anand Keshari …… for the petitioner …… for the State Heard learned lawyer for the parties. We have considered the materials on record. Statement of the minor shows that she was kidnapped and detained. She was also administered drugs and raped. In view of the aforesaid allegations and the gravity of offence we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. No. 918 of 2022).
← Search more judgments