Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 ss. 400, 401
Judgment
Mr. Bihani, learned advocate representing the KMC has submitted that based on the complaint lodged by the petitioner notice under 2 section 401 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 dated 16th November, 2020 was issued and steps were taken to restrain the private respondents not to continue alleged illegal construction violating the sanctioned plan. It has also been submitted that one demolition case has been initiated under section 400 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980 and the same is pending before the concerned authority consideration. It has been submitted previously on two occasions attempts were made to conduct hearing in connection with the said demolition case by sending notices to petitioner as well as private respondents but such hearing could not be held since on the first occasion parties did not turn up and subsequently notices returned with endorsement “address cannot be located”. Private respondent No. 7 is represented by learned advocate who has denied the allegations made on behalf of the petitioner with regard to erection of unauthorised construction disregarding the sanctioned plan by him. This Court has heard the learned advocates representing the parties and has perused the relevant materials available on record. Considering the submission made on behalf 3 of KMC which goes to show that the demolition case has been initiated in terms of section 400 of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation Act, 1980. This Court finds it proper to direct the concerned authority of KMC to conclude such demolition case after hearing the petitioner and the private respondents. Today this writ petition is being heard in presence of the learned advocates representing the petitioner and the respondent no. 7. Therefore this Court directs the Executive Engineer Civil (Bldg.) Borough No. IV & V, Building Department, KMC, to hear the demolition case on 21st December, 2022 at
12.00 noon and conclude the hearing on the said date. No further notice shall be served upon the parties to such demolition case for holding hearing on the aforesaid date. On aforesaid date and time the petitioner as well as respondent no. 7 are directed to remain present before the Executive Engineer and make their deliberations. The Executive Engineer Civil (Bldg.), Borough No. IV & V is further directed to pass a final order on such demolition case and communicate the same to the parties within seven days thereafter. With the above direction, the writ petition 4 stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that the restraint order passed by the coordinate Bench on 8th June, 2009 restraining the private respondents from carrying out further construction shall continue for a period of two weeks after communication of the order to the parties which will be passed by the Executive Engineer on such demolition case. However, there shall be no order as to costs. The report filed by the Executive Engineer Civil (Bldg.) Borough No. IV & V, Building Department, KMC, dated 5th December, 2022 is taken on record. Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.