BAZAR POLICE STATION CASE No. 1286 of 2021 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DEBANGSU BASAK, BIBHAS RANJAN
Provisions considered
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ss. 21(c), 29
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 489B, 489C
Judgment
Mr. Mounick Ghosh Mr. Ranadeb Sengupta …for the petitioner. …for the State. Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the police filed charge-sheet and, therefore, further detention of the petitioner is not required. No recovery was made from the possession of the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner fled away from the spot. Commercial quantity of narcotic along with fake currency were recovered from the spot from where the petitioner fled away. Considering the gravity of the offence and the involvement of the petitioner there as transpiring from the materials in the case diary, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected. C.R.M. (A) 1992 of 2022 is, thus disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.) 2
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.