✦ Calcutta High Court

Judgment · High Court

JAY SENGUPTA

Case at a glance

Judgment

Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, Ms. Snigdha Saha. …for the petitioner. Mr. Subhomoy Bhattacharya, Ms. Poulami Bose. …for the State. Heard the learned counsels for the parties. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press this application. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as not pressed. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order may be delivered to the learned Advocates for the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all formalities. (Jay Sengupta, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments