No. 51 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. A K Bhowmick …… for the petitioner Mr. Debabrata Chatterjee Mr. Santanu Chatterjee …… for the State Petitioner is in custody for more than a year. He submits victim has been examined. He prays for bail. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the bail prayer. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner is the principal accused. He had violated the minor victim. There was no amorous relationship between the petitioner and the victim. In view of the aforesaid incriminating materials and the gravity of offence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer for bail is rejected. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.