✦ Calcutta High Court · 11 Feb 2025

Sri Anup Kumar Dutta v. The State of West Bengal & Ors

BIVAS PATTANAYAK5 min read

Case at a glance

Decided
11 Feb 2025
Bench
BIVAS PATTANAYAK

Provisions considered

Judgment

d) Such report shall be handed over to the parties. e) A hearing shall be given to the petitioner, the respondent no.6 and all other including a representative of the Burdwan Development Authority. The parties must also be allowed to furnish their written objection/version to the said report and adduce oral and documentary evidence in support of their contentions before the competent authority. All points raised by either party, will be decided. interested parties f) A reasoned order shall be passed and communicated to the parties. On the basis of what transpires at the hearing and during inspection, the proceedings shall be reached to its logical conclusion in accordance with law. The court has not gone into the merits of the claims. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the representation. The issues to be decided would be, whether the construction has been made in terms of the sanction granted by the panchayat samiti and the rules and regulations of the Burdwan Development Authority or not.

The question of right, title, encroachment and interest etc. shall not be gone into.” Pursuant to such direction issued by this Court, the Executive Officer, Burdwan-II Panchayat Samity, Barsul(U), Purba Bardhaman passed order with following directions on 6th October, 2023:-

As the sanctioned plan of the said building was not followed hence, Sri Goutam Ghosh is hereby ordered to 3 demolish the extended cantilever in compliance with the approved plan within 10/11/2023. If he failed to do the same within the stipulated time frame then the Prodhan Baikunthapur-I Gram Panchayat is hereby ordered to make arrangement for demolition of the same.

Since the demolition of the structure has not been made by private respondent no.11 within the stipulated period and the Prodhan, Baikunthapur-I Gram Panchayat failed to make arrangement for demolition of the same, the present writ petition has been filed.

Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that though the Executive Officer, Burdwan-II Panchayat Samity, held illegal construction has been made by the private respondent in violation of Section 114(A) of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 but it has only directed for demolition of the extended cantilever without directing for demolition of other portions of illegal construction. Being aggrieved by a portion of the said order, appeal has been preferred by the petitioner on 6th November, 2023 before the concerned authority. He seeks for execution of the order passed for demolition of extended cantilever as well as for early disposal of the appeal pending before the S.D.O., Burdwan Sadar. Mr. Uday Sankar Chattopadhyay, learned Advocate for private respondent no.11 submits that his client has also filed an application challenging the order of the Executive Officer, however, that is not in form.

He also indicates that his client while making construction 4 has complied the requirement as per West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973. Mr. Pinaki Ranjan Dhole, learned Advocate for the State-respondents submits that the order passed by Executive Officer pursuant to order of this Court, if not complied, should be directed to the Pradhan, respondent no.4 for its execution. From the materials placed before this Court, it is found that pursuant to order passed in WPA 469 of 2023, the Executive Officer, Burdwan-II Panchayat Samity has passed order directing the respondent no.11 for demolition of structure i.e. extended cantilever within a stipulated period. Failing which, the Pradhan, Baikunthapur-I Gram Panchayat was required to do the needful. It is not in dispute that such demolition has not been made by respondent no.11 within the stipulated period. Such being the position, respondent no.4, Prodhan, Baikunthapur-I Gram Panchayat is directed to take appropriate steps for demolition of the illegal construction in terms of order passed by the Executive Officer on 6th October, 2023, within a period of six weeks from date of communication of this order, if not already taken.

It is found that an appeal has been preferred by the petitioner before the S.D.O., Burdwan Sadar (North), Purba Burdwan under Section 114A of the West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 on 6th November, 2023 on the 5 grounds excepting the direction passed for demolition of extended cantilever. However, the same has not been disposed of as yet. Accordingly, the Sub Divisional Officer, Burdwan Sadar (North), Purba Burdwan Town, respondent no.5 herein, is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner on 6th November, 2023 as expeditiously as possible. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition being WPA No.6636 of 2024 stands disposed of. All connected applications, if any, stand disposed of. There will be, however, no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. All concerned parties shall act in terms of the copy of the order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)

Questions this judgment answers

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226; West Bengal Panchayat Act, 1973 — ss. 114(A), 114A.

Which court decided this case, and when?

Calcutta High Court, on 11 Feb 2025. The bench was BIVAS PATTANAYAK.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments