✦ Calcutta High Court

2025 + IA NO: CAN/1/2025 Aryan Mining and Trading Corporation Private Limited v. Ratan Kothari

Can No. 1 of 2025

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Hence, it is obvious that the learned trial Court overlooked or failed to appreciate the relevant pleadings in the plaint. On that ground alone, we set aside the order under appeal. The matter is remanded to the learned trial Court for fresh consideration.

Judgment

Mr. Anuj Singh, Ms. Trinisha De, Mr. Aman Agarwal, Ms. Ankita Baid, Ms. Ritika Dey … For the Appellant. Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J.

1.

This appeal is directed against an order dated January 09, 2025 passed by the learned Judge, Commercial Court at Alipore in MS (Com) 171 of 2024, whereby the learned Judge rejected the plaint of the suit filed by the present appellant. The primary ground on which the learned Judge rejected the plaint is that the appellant/plaintiff has not prayed for dispensation of the requirement of pre- suit mediation contemplated in Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

2.

We have gone through the order impugned. We have read the plaint. Not only the plaintiff has pleaded its case for dispensation of pre-suit mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 in paragraph 22 of the plaint, the prayers in the plaint also include a prayer for leave 2 under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act,

3.

Hence, it is obvious that the learned trial Court overlooked or failed to appreciate the relevant pleadings in the plaint. On that ground alone, we set aside the order under appeal. The matter is remanded to the learned trial Court for fresh consideration.

4.

The appeal and the connected application are, accordingly, disposed of.

5.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

6.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of necessary formalities. (Om Narayan Rai, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Can No. 1 of 2025). ← Search more judgments