Kanai Karmakar & Ors. v. Dipayon Roy, The Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering directorate & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- DEBANGSU BASAK, PARTHA SARATHI SEN
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Rahul Karmakar, Advocate Mr. Sourav Guchhait, Advocate …for the petitioners Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Sr. Standing Counsel Mr. Debopriyo Karan, Advocate …for the alleged contemnor nos.1 & 2
Affidavit of compliance filed in Court be taken on record.
Affidavit discloses substantial compliance.
Discrepancies, if any, and further claims may be agitated before an appropriate forum.
Since there is substantial compliance, we deem it appropriate not to invoke the provisions of the Article 215 of the Constitution of India or the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 any further in the facts and circumstances of the present case.
Disposal of the main contempt matter will not be construed to mean that we pronounced on the claims of the rival parties, if any, existing as on date. 2
Rule issued stands discharged. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.