✦ Calcutta High Court

NABADWIP P.S CASE No. 90 of 2022 · Calcutta High Court

NABADWIP P.S CASE No. 90 of 20222 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Mujibar Ali Naskar ….. petitioners …… for the petitioner Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherji, Ld. P.P. Mr. Aniket Mitra …… for the State It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that victim lady had a previous marriage with one Pradip Das. Suppressing such fact, she had been given in marriage to petitioner No.1. After marriage, she ran away with Pradip and a missing diary was registered by her mother. Out of depression, she committed suicide. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits petitioner No.1 husband had demanded money for his business and over such demand victim housewife was tortured. Consequently she committed suicide. Petitioner No.1 has criminal antecedents and had been earlier implicated in a similar case relating to dowry death of his former wife. We have considered the materials on record. Petitioner No.1 has criminal antecedents. A criminal case was registered against him earlier relating to unnatural death of his former wife over dowry demands. Statement of witnesses disclose he had demanded 2 money from his-in-laws and subjected the victim housewife to torture over such demands. As a result, she committed suicide. In view of the aforesaid facts, we are of the opinion this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.1. In so far as petitioner Nos. 2 to 6, who are in-laws of the victim housewife are concerned, allegations levelled against them are general and omnibus in nature. Keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 in the alleged crime, we are of the opinion petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 may be granted anticipatory bail. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner Nos. 2 to 6 shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Petitioner No. 2 to 6 shall appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date. The application being CRM (A) 1373 of 2022 is disposed of. ( Bivas Pattanayak, J. ) ( Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. NABADWIP P.S CASE No. 90 of 2022). ← Search more judgments