✦ Calcutta High Court

(DL) v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL Mr. Ranjan Kali, Adv & Ors.

SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

Writ petition stands disposed of

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (Appellate Side) W.P.A. 5169 OF 2026 SARMILA MONDAL VS. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS Mr. Ranjan Kali, Adv. Ms. Mitul Chakraborty, Adv. Ms. Payel Nath, Adv. …for the Petitioner Mr. Pannalal Bandopadhyay, Adv. Mr. Prabir Kumar Ray, Adv. …for the State Ms. Soni Ojha, Adv. Mr. Pranit Biswas, Adv. …for the Respondent No.7

1.

At the time of call learned advocate representing the petitioner submits that in connection with the criminal prosecution initiated charge-sheet was filed by the concerned police authority and the grievance ventilated in this writ petition stands redressed.

2.

State respondents and respondent no.7 are represented by learned advocates.

3.

In view of submission made on behalf of the petitioner, no further order need be passed on this writ petition.

Operative part

4.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

5.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings.

(SAUGATA BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Calcutta High Court or eCourts case status. ← Search more judgments