Judgment · High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- TIRTHANKAR GHOSH
Provisions considered
Judgment
Mr. Lakshminath Bhattacharya Mr. Rajib Kumar Acharyya Mr. B. B. Maity Mr. Goutam Malick … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Malay Kumar Singh Ms. Neelam Singh … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. R. I. Sardar … for the respondent no. 8 Affidavit-of-service so filed be kept with the record. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that his representation dated
10.02.2024 furnished with the Officer-in- charge of Kolaghat Police Station was not acted upon. The information so furnished reflects that there was a dispute with the Headmaster of Gopalganj P.N. Banibhaban (H.S.) where the petitioner was an employee. The petitioner happens to be a member of the Managing Committee of the said school also. In view of the representation so furnished on 10.02.2024 as also the report submitted by the police authorities reflects that a proceeding under Section 107 of the Cr.P.C. has been drawn up against the Headmaster, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he would approach the jurisdictional Magistrate with a prayer for appropriate relief(s) under the relevant provisions of law. The learned Magistrate would consider the same and pass necessary directions and/or orders adhering to the provisions of law. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 5275 of 2024 is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report so submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.